The SCA recommendations concerning the NHRI regarded the necessity for additional funding regarding the recruitment of staff at senior level, as well as on the need to ensure that the Human Rights Advisory Committee is functional and to continue to enhance and formalise its working relationships and cooperation with a wide range of civil society organisations and human rights defenders, including those working on the rights of various groups.
Concerning funding and staff recruitment, it is noted that seven (7) staff members have been recruited in 2023. Previously and, in particular, during the period 2020-2021 five (5) Officers were also recruited, bringing the total number of new recruits to 12 Officers. At the same time, in 2022 two NHRI Officers were promoted to higher rank positions (Officer A).
The NHRI has also increased its support/secretarial staff with the recruitment of three new secretarial staff members and one hourly employee.
As a result, human resources have been significantly strengthened. However, given that the NHRI’s powers and responsibilities have also increased, particularly in view of the new role it has been entrusted with to monitor compliance of the implementation of EU funded programmes with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, it has already contacted the Minister of Finance and sought approval for additional Senior Officer posts.
Furthermore, it is noted that at the moment, there is one vacant post for an Officer, one vacant post for an Officer A and one vacant post for a Senior Officer in the organisation chart. When the latter two posts are undertaken - via the promotion of existing staff members - the total number of vacant Officer posts will rise to three. The NHRI will attempt to ensure that in next year's budget additional posts will be approved and included, so that the total number of vacant posts of Officers will be additionally increased, in order to proceed with the recruitment of new Officers.
Concerning the Human Rights Advisory Committee, it is noted that is composed by representatives of NGOs related to the protection of human rights of all vulnerable groups of the population (such as persons with disabilities, refugees, LGBTI people, prisoners, protection of women from any form of violence, etc.), it is completely functional and it meets regularly. During the meetings, issues of concern related to the groups of the population each NGO represents are discussed and solutions are sought together.
Furthermore, it is noted that the Commissioner presides over the Consultative Committee for the Monitoring of the UNCRPD, in which persons with disabilities and representatives of their representative organizations and the Cyprus Confederation of Organizations of the Disabled (CCOD) participate. Therefore, during the meetings all issues concerning persons with disabilities are discussed and addressed and solutions are jointly sought.
Also, at a more general level, NGOs submit complaints to the NHRI on behalf of specific persons or in relation to issues that come to their attention, and it immediately proceeds to their investigation.
NHRI follow-up on the recommendations concerning their institution, issued by European actors
In 2024 EU Rule of Law Report, it was noted that the NHRI’s role of monitoring compliance of the implementation of EU funded programmes with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the framework of the ‘Horizontal Enabling Condition on the Charter, “is considered challenging as it impacts on the already heavy workload of the Office and could require reinforcement in terms of resources. While the recruitment of seven additional staff members in 2023 increased its capacity, the need for further staff at senior level remains”. As mentioned, efforts have been made to further reinforce staff capacity.
Concerning the NHRI’s, and in relation to the provision of legal assistance to individuals, it is noted that the Commissioner may participate in court proceedings as amicus curiae. Specifically and, in spite of the lack of specific procedural rules, dealing with amicus curiae issue, the Supreme Court established guidelines upon its jurisprudence on how a person/Institution, acting as an expert for a specific subject matter, such as the Attorney General of the Republic, or the Commissioner for Administration and Protection of Human Rights, as Equality Body can be a part of the trial, after the submission of a relevant application before the Competent Court. Furthermore, in cases where the Commissioner, in its capacity as an Equality Body, issues a binding decision, this decision can be challenged before the court by private individuals and private bodies, against the Equality Body. In such a case, the Commissioner is entitled to be heard in the judicial proceedings.is entitled to be heard in the judicial proceedings.
In relation to the obligation of the authorities to respond to the NHRI’s questions/enquiries, in a timely manner and with reasoned and analytical responses, it should be noted that during the last years the NHRI have witnessed that the involved services are responding in a more timely manner when it reaches out to them. This is obviously due to the visibility the NHRI has achieved over the years.